Field Bindweed Control: Quinclorac vs Picloram
Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) is a persistent and aggressive perennial weed that can be challenging to control in agricultural fields, pastures, lawns, and gardens. Effective management of field bindweed requires the use of herbicides that target its extensive root system and suppress its rapid growth. Quinclorac and Picloram are two commonly used herbicides for controlling field bindweed. While both are effective, they have different chemical properties, modes of action, and application methods. In this article, we will compare Quinclorac and Picloram to help you understand their differences and the best practices for their use in field bindweed control.
1. Introduction to Quinclorac and Picloram
Quinclorac
- Chemical Class: Quinclorac belongs to the quinoline carboxylic acid class of herbicides.
- Mode of Action: Quinclorac is a synthetic auxin-like herbicide that mimics plant hormones known as auxins. It interferes with the plant’s normal growth processes, causing distorted growth, chlorosis, and eventual death of the plant. It is a post-emergent herbicide that targets both broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Use: Primarily used to control annual and perennial broadleaf weeds and grasses, including field bindweed, in various crops like soybeans, wheat, corn, and lawns.
Picloram
- Chemical Class: Picloram is a pyridine carboxylic acid herbicide.
- Mode of Action: Like quinclorac, picloram is also a synthetic auxin but is considered a systemic herbicide that is absorbed through the plant’s leaves, stems, and roots. It disrupts cell division and growth, leading to death of both above-ground and below-ground parts of the plant, including the roots. Picloram is especially effective against deep-rooted perennials like field bindweed.
- Use: Picloram is commonly used to control woody plants, perennial broadleaf weeds, and invasive species like bindweed, Russian thistle, and brush in agricultural settings, rangelands, and pastures.
2. Effectiveness Against Field Bindweed
Quinclorac for Field Bindweed
- Target Weeds: Quinclorac is effective in controlling field bindweed when applied post-emergence. It is particularly useful in controlling the above-ground parts of the weed, including the leaves and stems.
- Mode of Action: Quinclorac works by inhibiting the growth of bindweed plants, distorting their structure, and eventually leading to their death. However, for bindweed with extensive root systems, quinclorac may require repeated applications for complete control.
- Application: For effective control of field bindweed, quinclorac should be applied when the weed is actively growing, preferably in the spring or early summer before flowering. Multiple applications may be required for complete eradication, especially in heavily infested areas.
Picloram for Field Bindweed
- Target Weeds: Picloram is considered one of the most effective herbicides for controlling field bindweed, especially when applied to perennial plants with deep, established root systems.
- Mode of Action: As a systemic herbicide, picloram is absorbed by the leaves and translocated throughout the plant, including the roots. This makes it highly effective against perennial weeds like bindweed that are difficult to control through foliar herbicides alone.
- Application: Picloram is often used in rangelands, forestry, and non-crop areas where field bindweed is a persistent problem. It can also be used in agricultural fields, though caution is needed to avoid crop damage. Spring or early summer applications are most effective when bindweed is actively growing, but picloram may also be applied in the fall for long-term control.
3. Key Differences Between Quinclorac and Picloram
| Factor | Quinclorac | Picloram |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Class | Quinoline carboxylic acid | Pyridine carboxylic acid |
| Mode of Action | Synthetic auxin-like herbicide (growth regulator) | Synthetic auxin (systemic herbicide, targets roots and shoots) |
| Effectiveness | Effective on above-ground parts of field bindweed | Highly effective on both above-ground and root system of bindweed |
| Application Timing | Spring/early summer (post-emergence) | Spring/early summer or fall (post-emergence, systemic control) |
| Persistence | Moderate persistence, especially in soils | Longer persistence in soil, providing long-term control |
| Safety | Safe on most crops (e.g., wheat, corn) | Restricted use in some areas due to soil persistence |
| Primary Use | Annual and perennial weed control | Perennial weed control, especially in non-crop areas |
| Environmental Impact | Lower environmental impact | Can affect non-target plants and water sources if misapplied |
4. Application Guidelines
Quinclorac Application Guidelines
- Timing: Best applied in spring or early summer when bindweed is actively growing. Avoid applying during drought conditions or when weeds are stressed, as this may reduce effectiveness.
- Concentration: Typical application rates range from 0.25 to 1.0 lb a.i./acre, depending on the severity of the infestation and the crop being treated. Always refer to the label for specific recommendations.
- Method: Quinclorac is typically applied via ground-based sprayers or aerial spraying for larger fields. Target the foliage of the bindweed to ensure proper absorption.
Picloram Application Guidelines
- Timing: Can be applied in spring, summer, or fall when field bindweed is actively growing. Early-season applications are often more effective, but fall applications can offer long-term suppression by targeting the root system.
- Concentration: Common application rates for pasture management are 0.5 to 1.0 lb a.i./acre. For rangeland or forestry applications, rates can vary, but lower concentrations are often used for broad-spectrum control.
- Method: Picloram is applied through ground sprayers, aircraft, or as a cut stump treatment in more targeted applications.
5. Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages of Quinclorac
- Effective on both grasses and broadleaf weeds.
- Less persistent in soil than picloram, which can be a benefit in areas where soil health and subsequent crop rotation are priorities.
- Relatively safe for crops like corn and soybeans, making it a good choice for agricultural use.
Disadvantages of Quinclorac
- May require multiple applications for complete control, especially in dense field bindweed infestations.
- Limited systemic activity, meaning it may not completely control field bindweed’s deep root system without follow-up treatments.
Advantages of Picloram
- Highly effective on perennial weeds like field bindweed, including its root system.
- Provides long-term control, reducing the need for repeated applications.
- Works well in non-crop areas, forestry, and rangelands, making it versatile in different settings.
Disadvantages of Picloram
- Environmental persistence can be a concern, especially near water sources, as it can leach into groundwater.
- Restricted use in certain crops and residential areas due to its long soil persistence and potential environmental risks.
6. Conclusion
Both Quinclorac and Picloram are effective tools in the control of field bindweed, but they differ in their mode of action, effectiveness, and environmental impact.
- If you are dealing with annual weeds and need a less persistent solution for agricultural crops like corn or soybeans, Quinclorac is a good option.
- However, for more persistent, long-term control of field bindweed, particularly in rangelands, forestry, or areas with heavy infestations, Picloram may be the better choice.
By considering the specific needs of your field, the severity of the infestation, and the environmental conditions, you can determine the most appropriate herbicide for effectively managing field bindweed. Always remember to follow the label instructions for safe and efficient application.
Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) is a persistent and aggressive perennial weed that can be challenging to control in agricultural fields, pastures, lawns, and gardens. Effective management of field bindweed requires the use of herbicides that target its extensive root system and suppress its rapid growth. Quinclorac and Picloram are two commonly used herbicides for controlling field bindweed. While both are effective, they have different chemical properties, modes of action, and application methods. In this article, we will compare Quinclorac and Picloram to help you understand their differences and the best practices for their use in field bindweed control.
1. Introduction to Quinclorac and Picloram
Quinclorac
- Chemical Class: Quinclorac belongs to the quinoline carboxylic acid class of herbicides.
- Mode of Action: Quinclorac is a synthetic auxin-like herbicide that mimics plant hormones known as auxins. It interferes with the plant’s normal growth processes, causing distorted growth, chlorosis, and eventual death of the plant. It is a post-emergent herbicide that targets both broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Use: Primarily used to control annual and perennial broadleaf weeds and grasses, including field bindweed, in various crops like soybeans, wheat, corn, and lawns.
Picloram
- Chemical Class: Picloram is a pyridine carboxylic acid herbicide.
- Mode of Action: Like quinclorac, picloram is also a synthetic auxin but is considered a systemic herbicide that is absorbed through the plant’s leaves, stems, and roots. It disrupts cell division and growth, leading to death of both above-ground and below-ground parts of the plant, including the roots. Picloram is especially effective against deep-rooted perennials like field bindweed.
- Use: Picloram is commonly used to control woody plants, perennial broadleaf weeds, and invasive species like bindweed, Russian thistle, and brush in agricultural settings, rangelands, and pastures.
2. Effectiveness Against Field Bindweed
Quinclorac for Field Bindweed
- Target Weeds: Quinclorac is effective in controlling field bindweed when applied post-emergence. It is particularly useful in controlling the above-ground parts of the weed, including the leaves and stems.
- Mode of Action: Quinclorac works by inhibiting the growth of bindweed plants, distorting their structure, and eventually leading to their death. However, for bindweed with extensive root systems, quinclorac may require repeated applications for complete control.
- Application: For effective control of field bindweed, quinclorac should be applied when the weed is actively growing, preferably in the spring or early summer before flowering. Multiple applications may be required for complete eradication, especially in heavily infested areas.
Picloram for Field Bindweed
- Target Weeds: Picloram is considered one of the most effective herbicides for controlling field bindweed, especially when applied to perennial plants with deep, established root systems.
- Mode of Action: As a systemic herbicide, picloram is absorbed by the leaves and translocated throughout the plant, including the roots. This makes it highly effective against perennial weeds like bindweed that are difficult to control through foliar herbicides alone.
- Application: Picloram is often used in rangelands, forestry, and non-crop areas where field bindweed is a persistent problem. It can also be used in agricultural fields, though caution is needed to avoid crop damage. Spring or early summer applications are most effective when bindweed is actively growing, but picloram may also be applied in the fall for long-term control.
3. Key Differences Between Quinclorac and Picloram
| Factor | Quinclorac | Picloram |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Class | Quinoline carboxylic acid | Pyridine carboxylic acid |
| Mode of Action | Synthetic auxin-like herbicide (growth regulator) | Synthetic auxin (systemic herbicide, targets roots and shoots) |
| Effectiveness | Effective on above-ground parts of field bindweed | Highly effective on both above-ground and root system of bindweed |
| Application Timing | Spring/early summer (post-emergence) | Spring/early summer or fall (post-emergence, systemic control) |
| Persistence | Moderate persistence, especially in soils | Longer persistence in soil, providing long-term control |
| Safety | Safe on most crops (e.g., wheat, corn) | Restricted use in some areas due to soil persistence |
| Primary Use | Annual and perennial weed control | Perennial weed control, especially in non-crop areas |
| Environmental Impact | Lower environmental impact | Can affect non-target plants and water sources if misapplied |
4. Application Guidelines
Quinclorac Application Guidelines
- Timing: Best applied in spring or early summer when bindweed is actively growing. Avoid applying during drought conditions or when weeds are stressed, as this may reduce effectiveness.
- Concentration: Typical application rates range from 0.25 to 1.0 lb a.i./acre, depending on the severity of the infestation and the crop being treated. Always refer to the label for specific recommendations.
- Method: Quinclorac is typically applied via ground-based sprayers or aerial spraying for larger fields. Target the foliage of the bindweed to ensure proper absorption.
Picloram Application Guidelines
- Timing: Can be applied in spring, summer, or fall when field bindweed is actively growing. Early-season applications are often more effective, but fall applications can offer long-term suppression by targeting the root system.
- Concentration: Common application rates for pasture management are 0.5 to 1.0 lb a.i./acre. For rangeland or forestry applications, rates can vary, but lower concentrations are often used for broad-spectrum control.
- Method: Picloram is applied through ground sprayers, aircraft, or as a cut stump treatment in more targeted applications.
5. Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages of Quinclorac
- Effective on both grasses and broadleaf weeds.
- Less persistent in soil than picloram, which can be a benefit in areas where soil health and subsequent crop rotation are priorities.
- Relatively safe for crops like corn and soybeans, making it a good choice for agricultural use.
Disadvantages of Quinclorac
- May require multiple applications for complete control, especially in dense field bindweed infestations.
- Limited systemic activity, meaning it may not completely control field bindweed’s deep root system without follow-up treatments.
Advantages of Picloram
- Highly effective on perennial weeds like field bindweed, including its root system.
- Provides long-term control, reducing the need for repeated applications.
- Works well in non-crop areas, forestry, and rangelands, making it versatile in different settings.
Disadvantages of Picloram
- Environmental persistence can be a concern, especially near water sources, as it can leach into groundwater.
- Restricted use in certain crops and residential areas due to its long soil persistence and potential environmental risks.
6. Conclusion
Both Quinclorac and Picloram are effective tools in the control of field bindweed, but they differ in their mode of action, effectiveness, and environmental impact.
- If you are dealing with annual weeds and need a less persistent solution for agricultural crops like corn or soybeans, Quinclorac is a good option.
- However, for more persistent, long-term control of field bindweed, particularly in rangelands, forestry, or areas with heavy infestations, Picloram may be the better choice.
By considering the specific needs of your field, the severity of the infestation, and the environmental conditions, you can determine the most appropriate herbicide for effectively managing field bindweed. Always remember to follow the label instructions for safe and efficient application.
Share to:
